|
Index
1
2
3
4
5
6
A change in Training Of
Quality Managers
5 OTHER
APPROACHES TO LEADERSHIP
Quinn was the
mode that was first selected
but his work dates back to
1988. The Working
Groups have collapsed down
the number of dimensions
from eight to six or
seven.(see appendixB).
Further
research has drawn out some
new distinctions that will
impact on the issue of
competencies for example the
table below draws the
distinction between
traditional leadership and
management and the role of a
leader-manager (Hooper,
2000).
|
Traditional
Leadership |
Traditional
management |
New Leader-manager |
|
Envision |
Direct |
Learn |
|
Communicate |
Develop |
Encourage |
|
Inspire |
Focus |
Open |
|
Energize |
Plan |
Handle ambiguity |
|
Create |
Schedule |
Break down barriers |
|
Innovate |
Allocate |
Partner |
|
Discover |
Delegate |
Encourage |
|
Spot opportunity |
Provide continuity |
Enable |
|
Mobilize |
Manage quality |
Co-create |
It can be
seen that the Quinn Model
fits much more to the
traditional models. So then
what are the competencies
required for the new
leader-manager?
Daniel
Goleman has written
extensively Emotional
Intelligence (EI) (eg Primal
Leadership). He cites
the analysis of data from
competence models indicating
that intellect, cognitive
skills such as big-picture
thinking and long-term
vision were important. He
has found that EI skills
played an increasing role at
higher levels in
organisations where
technical skills are less
important.
leadership
competences relating to EI
are as follows:
Self-awareness
·
Emotional
self-awareness
·
Accurate
self-assessment
·
Self-confidence
Self-management
·
Self-control
·
Transparency
·
Adaptability
·
Achievement
·
Initiative
·
Optimism
Social awareness
·
Empathy
(micro-level)
·
CSR (Macro
level)
·
Organisational awareness
·
Service
Relationship Management
·
Inspiration
·
Influence
·
Developing
others
·
Change
catalyst
·
Conflict
management
·
Teamwork and
collaboration
These all
complement the competencies
suggested by Quinn.
In further
work this has been related
to six styles of leadership:
1.
Coercive: “Do
what I say”
2.
Authorative :
“ Come with me”
3.
Affiliative:
“ People come first”
4.
Democratic:
Giving workers a voice in
decisions.
5.
Pacesetting:
Setting high performance
standards
6.
Coaching:
Focus on personal
development
It has been
found that an Authorative
style is the most effective
and the Pacesetting and
Coercive styles least
effective.
In some other
work the distinction has
been drawn between
Transformational Leadership
and Transactional
Leadership. The
diagram below illustrates
the essential principles:

The
competencies for a
Transformational Leader are
similar to those of
Emotional Intelligence.
Therein
attitude and
skills appear to be far more
important than knowledge.
This
leadership is not restricted
to the top management but
the responsibility of each
professional in the
organisation.
The challenge
for the leader is to create
a climate in which everyone
feels responsible and
accountable for the mutual
open space.
Index
1
2
3
4
5
6
|